The overlooked findings from Finland's "basic income" experiment

Posted on Monday, 18 February 2019
Body

The first set of preliminary results have been released from Finland’s so-called Basic Income experiment.

We say “so-called” because while the payments bore some of the hallmarks of Basic Income, the experiment was far from perfect in many respects, as it targeted only unemployed people rather than the general population, and the stated aim of the programme was to test the employment effects of making social welfare payments unconditional on labour market status, rather than a more holistic analysis.

Scanning the headlines in the days following the release, a pattern seems to have emerged in the narrative: “Basic Income has no positive effect employment take-up”. The reality is somewhat more nuanced.

Over the course of this experiment, the Finnish government gave 2,000 unemployed people a payment of €560 per month. This was not particularly revolutionary, as it amounts to the usual social welfare payment for jobseekers in Finland. What was revolutionary was the idea that it was not conditional on employment status: If the recipient took up a job they could still keep their monthly welfare payment, and they would not have it withdrawn on account of failing to engage with labour market activation or other such programmes. The idea was to see if giving the payment based on these conditions would make people more likely to take up employment. The logic is this: If a welfare recipient gets a job, they lose their welfare and this fact may incentivise them to remain unemployed. But if they don’t have to worry about this, unemployed people will be more likely to go seek work.

Reporting of the preliminary results from the experiment suggest this is not the case as participants in the experiment were no more or less likely to get jobs than other unemployed people for whom the usual conditions were attached to the payment. (There was a large control group for comparison). Cue a lot of shoulder-shrugging and a conclusion that “basic income has failed”.

Such assessments are missing a couple of key points. The first is that the long-running idea that if governments gave people free and unconditional money they wouldn’t bother to work has been knocked more than a little by these results. The Finnish government gave unconditional money to a particular group of unemployed people, and found they were no less likely to get jobs than other unemployed people.**

True, they were no more likely to, at least in the first half the experiment – the results from the second year are still to be analysed – but it does indicate that perhaps people aren't unemployed because they're lazy or unmotivated. Perhaps they're unemployed because there aren't enough jobs to go around. For example, the McKinsey Global Institute has reported that automation could destroy up to 800 million jobs around the world by 2030. This will lead to many employment opportunities disappearing, regardless of how welfare systems purport to motivate recipients.

Another key point that is being missed is that the results show that those participants in the experiment who received their unconditional payment were happier, healthier, and less stressed than their counterparts, while also being no less likely to contribute to society. Confidence levels in the test group were also better than in the control group, as was self-perceived assessment of good health - 54.8 per cent at good or very good, versus 46.2 per cent in the control group.

The table below illustrates how the experiment participants had a broadly very positive attitude towards the idea of a Basic Income-type payment, and that they felt it was beneficial.

**Interestingly, of those in the test group who found part-time work, 69 per cent said they would rather full-time work, while 58 per cent of the control group in part-time work expressed the same preference for more working hours. This difference in preference could not be explained by the survey which, it must be noted, has quite a small sample size of respondents for this question.

Interested in more information on Basic Income?

Check out the papers at Social Justice Ireland's 2016 Social Policy Conference on the subject of Basic Income

Videos of each presentation, as well as a free download of the papers, are available here

×
This website uses cookies
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show details Hide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Targeting
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
Cookie report
Name Domain Expiration Description
CookieScriptConsent www.socialjustice.ie 1 month This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
AWSELBCORS www.podbean.com 5 minutes The cookies AWSELB and AWSELBCORS are functionally the same cookies. The latter has an explicit SameSite attribute set because of changes made from Chrome 80 and upwards. 
__cf_bm .podbean.com 30 minutes This cookie is used to distinguish between humans and bots. This is beneficial for the website, in order to make valid reports on the use of their website.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Cookie report
Name Domain Expiration Description
_ga .socialjustice.ie 2 years This cookie name is associated with Google Universal Analytics - which is a significant update to Google's more commonly used analytics service. This cookie is used to distinguish unique users by assigning a randomly generated number as a client identifier. It is included in each page request in a site and used to calculate visitor, session and campaign data for the sites analytics reports.
_gid .socialjustice.ie 1 day This cookie is set by Google Analytics. It stores and update a unique value for each page visited and is used to count and track pageviews.
Targeting cookies are used to identify visitors between different websites, eg. content partners, banner networks. Those cookies may be used by companies to build a profile of visitor interests or show relevant ads on other websites.
Cookie report
Name Domain Expiration Description
_gat_gtag_UA_30714684_1 .socialjustice.ie 1 minute This cookie is part of Google Analytics and is used to limit requests (throttle request rate).
YSC .youtube.com Session This cookie is set by YouTube to track views of embedded videos.
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE .youtube.com 6 months This cookie is set by Youtube to keep track of user preferences for Youtube videos embedded in sites;it can also determine whether the website visitor is using the new or old version of the Youtube interface.
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser. You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
Cookies consent ID:
Cookie report created by Cookie-Script